Home News
News
SC refuses to dump 'socialism', still a must for all parties PDF Print E-mail
News - Latest
Written by Rajesh   
NEW DELHI: It is close to two decades since India veered away from "socialism" to loosen the state's grip over the economy and to create a bigger play for market forces, but political parties must continue to declare allegiance to "socialism" enshrined in the Preamble of the Constitution to get recognition from Election Commission. The Supreme Court on Monday refused to entertain a PIL against the anomaly. Significantly, the top court cited an interesting reason to turn down the petition argued by senior advocate Fali S Nariman. It said no political party, including those responsible for getting the state to vacate the "commanding heights" of the economy, had objected to being required to swear by socialism. Section 29-A of Representation of People Act mandates that no political party would be registered by Election Commission unless it bore "true faith and allegiance to the Constitution of India as by law established and to the principles of socialism, secularism and democracy..." The Centre, in its affidavit before the SC, had defended the provision in RP Act mandating political parties to stick to the concept of socialism and said it was "one of the fundamental principles underlying the Constitution". Appearing for the PIL petitioner, NGO `Good Governance India Foundation', Nariman said market forces were the determining factor since early the 1990s which marked the beginning of liberalisation era in India and it was a dichotomy to force political parties to owe allegiance to "socialism". TIMES OF INDIA A Bench comprising Chief Justice S H Kapadia and Justices K S Radhakrishnan and Swatanter Kumar asked why no party had ever protested against it. While Nariman said the declarations owing allegiance to Constitution were given in a routine manner though most did not practise it, many feel that the "habit" suggests that turning away from socialism is still not regarded fashionable or correct even after the ideology lost its appeal. Nariman also cited the objection of Dr B R Ambedkar, main architect of the Constitution, to insertion of the word "socialist' in the Preamble and how it was left out from the Constitution after a lengthy debate during the Constituent Assembly proceedings. But solicitor general Gopal Subramaniam said all parties knew their duties and none had ever objected or moved the Election Commission challenging the requirement to give declaration owing allegiance to the word "socialist". Taking the cue, the Bench disposed of the petition saying though the PIL raised an important question of law, it was purely academic in nature at present. "The court will decide such a question as and when a political party which is refused recognition by EC raises it," the Bench said.
Read 0 Comments... >>
 
City Council of Weimer gives Human Rights Prize 2010 to IFAN member Dr. Lenin Raghuvanshi PDF Print E-mail
News - Latest
Written by Co-ordinator   
.attach_div {float:left;margin:3px;} .attach_content_div {font-size:14px; text-align:center;}

Weimar: City Council gives Human Rights Prize 2010 to Dr. Lenin Raghuvanshi of India

Posted on 2010/06/29

The City Council announced in its session of 23rd June, 2010 that it will give the Human Rights Prize of the City of Weimar 2010 to Dr. Lenin Raghuvanshi of India. Dr. Lenin Raghuvanshi has been working for 15 years for the rights and interests of the Dalits, primarily in the Indian state of Uttar Pradesh.

Extract from citation for City of Weimar Human Rights Prize

As the founder of the Peoples‘ Vigilance Committee on Human Rights ( PVCHR ), he strove to maintain and enforce the fundamental rights of vulnerable groups such as children, women , Dalits and indigenous minorities.

Dr. Raghuvanshi with his committee put in place structures that allow it to demand these basic rights. He also documented many kinds of human rights such as starvation, police torture, child labor, etc., and tried through cooperation with local human rights groups to care for the victims individually.

Because of their commitment to human rights are he, his family and associates face permanent hostility (including death threats ) from political opponents. Dr. Lenin Raghuvanshi was proposed for this Award by the "Friedrich Naumann Foundation for Freedom".

The city of Weimar has the honour to remember its special historical responsibility and remember all the nameless victims of dictatorships and tyrannies in the world, a human rights award.

Weimar is a city in Germany famous for its cultural heritage. Weimar's cultural heritage is vast. It is most often recognised as the place where Germany's first democratic constitution was signed after the First World War, giving its name to the Weimar Republic period in German politics, of 1918–1933. However, the city was also the focal point of the German Enlightenment and was where writers Goethe and Schiller developed the literary movement of Weimar Classicism. The city was also the birthplace of the Bauhaus movement, founded in 1919 by Walter Gropius, with artists Wassily Kandinsky, Paul Klee, Oskar Schlemmer, and Lyonel Feininger teaching in Weimar's Bauhaus School.

Previous Winners of the Weimar Human Rights Prize include Sonja Biserko of Serbia, Jestina Mukoko of Zimbabwe and Father Shay Cullen from the Philippines.


Read 0 Comments... >>
 
IFAN Event, 1 April 2010 PDF Print E-mail
News - Latest
Written by Manali Shah   

India FNF Alumni Network (IFAN)
in partnership with
Friedrich-Naumann-Stiftung für die Freiheit

Invites you to a documentary screening followed by discussion on
Auto Rickshaws: Boon or Bane for Delhi?
1 April 2010, New Delhi

Resource Person: Key stakeholders
Moderator: Prashant Narang, Prabodh
Registration: 1630 hrs onwards
Documentary screening: 1700 hrs – 1730 hrs
Discussion: 1730 hrs-1800 hrs
Hi-Tea: 1800 hrs --1900 hrs

Venue: Indian Women Press Club, Opposite Le Meridian Hotel, Janpath, New Delhi  
RSVP: India FNF Alumni Network, New Delhi; Mobile nos.: 9811322297 (Prashant Narang) & 9818499293 (Nupur Hasija, FNF New Delhi) ; email: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it   This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it

Third Wheel |27 minutes|Hindi
On one hand, government spends heavily on employment guarantee schemes and provides stimulus to combat the global financial crisis, on the other hand, it restricts the livelihood of self-employed poor through the license-permit raaj and it is even ready to displace poor in the name of beautification in wake of Commonwealth games. One such sector is Intermediate public transport sector in Delhi which already heavily regulated leading to not just a grey market but also sub-standard services for the commuters. Should these be phased out?  Autorickshaws in India: you may like them, depend on them or hate them-but you cannot ignore them.  Can deregulation and opening up of this sector release it from the clutches of the exploitative auto mafia?, see preview of the film http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TVWjuH8p1_Q&feature=youtube_gdata.


Read 0 Comments... >>
 
A new documentary on economic freedom for urban poor! PDF Print E-mail
News - Latest
Written by Manali Shah   

“The Third Wheel: A Documentary on Economic Freedom for the Urban Poor”
(27 minutes, English and Hindi)


A film by Prabodh and Centre for Public Policy Research under the banner of Liberal Youth South Asia, Directed by Saumitra Rath

About the film
Tuk-tuks or auto rickshaws are a common sight in most Asian countries.  Known as the transporter for the lower and middle class, they are an integral part of the transportation system of the country.  However, one wonders why there has been little improvement in their design or why they seem to be guilty of overcharging their customers and flouting the laws.  In India, as is the case with most professions, the auto-rickshaw is governed by a licensing system which has produced the unintended consequences, mainly being, financial mafia.  The film explores this omnipresent profession and tries to go beneath the surface to find out what is really gone.  And in doing so, it connects even those stakeholders who are usually ideologically opposed on most issues.  

In January 2010, Delhi's Environment Pollution Control Authority has recommended to the Supreme Court to remove the cap on number of licenses given to auto rickshaws for the same reasons as cited in the documentary-the emergence of the auto mafia.  

View the film
Catch a short version of the film at, http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=firstwheel2009#p/u/0/TVWjuH8p1_Q
Order your copy from This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it (Rs 100)

What can you do?

Organise screenings for key stakeholders in the transport debate (commuters, auto rickshaws unions and drivers, government officials, civil society, MPs and MLAs, media). The film is available in Hindi and English.
Write about this issue in media as it is something faced in all cities in India
Talk to auto rickshaw drivers and learn more about why they overcharge or say no to commuters etc.

 Prashant Narang 

This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it  


Read 0 Comments... >>
 
Are private schools better? PDF Print E-mail
News - Latest
Written by Co-ordinator   
Are private schools better?
Business Standard / New Delhi February 3, 2010, 0:45 IST
 
Parth J ShahParth J Shah

President, Centre for Civil Society

It is in recognition of the merit of private schools that the Act says they must reserve seats for the poor. Why not give students a 100 per cent choice?

The Right to Free and Compulsory Education Act entrusts the government with the responsibility to ensure that every child gets quality education in India. Does this mean that every child has to go to a building called “government school”? Is the school’s ownership really critical to assuring education? Does it really matter to parents and children where they get quality education?

The government guarantees education but this need not be achieved only through government schools. Sadly, many believe that schools have to be built, owned and operated by the government. These educationists seem to have turned a blind eye to the changing reality of the education landscape in India.

Parents are getting tired of teachers’ absenteeism and lack of accountability in government schools where 52 per cent of class-five students can’t even read to match up to the level of class-two (Annual Status of Education Report, 2009). They are increasingly rejecting free government schools and choosing fee-charging private schools. The Aser 2009 report shows that close to 22 per cent of children in rural India attend private schools. This number is much higher in urban areas with states like Punjab and Haryana at the forefront, where two out of every three children attend private school.


Read 2 Comments... >>
Read more...
 
«StartPrev123NextEnd»

Page 1 of 3
Copyright © 2010 indiafnfalumni.org. All Rights Reserved.
Website created by MindStar NetCorp, India
 
Bookmark and Share